While AI transformation presents universal challenges, our research reveals different industries face distinct hurdles based on regulatory environments, client expectations, and operational complexities. Understanding these nuances is crucial for tailoring transformation strategies effectively.
Legal services: Balancing innovation with regulatory compliance
Stephanie Hamon from Norton Rose Fulbright provides candid insight: "There's currently a gap between what people are saying about AI and what they're actually doing. AI has been around the legal industry for some time, but the emergence of generative AI is likely to have a more substantial impact."
She continues on timeline expectations: "Our surveys with in-house teams indicate they expect to see impact from generative AI from their law firms within 6-12 months, while they anticipate changes to their own workload within 2-3 years. However, I'm not convinced many law firms will be able to transform their service offerings that quickly."
Legal faces unique challenges around data confidentiality and professional liability. As Stephanie notes: "One challenge we've encountered in consulting and advisory activities relates to data confidentiality. While there are some straightforward applications, such as using AI for meeting minutes and notes, we need to carefully manage client data privacy concerns."
She emphasises domain expertise importance: "I witnessed a demonstration where a technical expert had developed an impressive 3,000-word prompt for contract review that delivered results in seconds rather than hours. Unfortunately, the prompt engineer lacked legal background and omitted crucial clauses like limitation of liability. When presented to lawyers, they immediately distrusted the entire tool because of these critical omissions."
Financial services: Navigating regulatory complexity
Jessica Samadi from a global financial services company describes the sector's challenges: "Companies are taking a measured, strategic approach to AI implementation across their global operations. One of the key initiatives I've seen is the development of in-house platforms that provide real-time monitoring and audit trails, ensuring strong governance practices throughout the organisation."
Regulatory overlay creates additional complexity. Jessica explains: "We carefully consider local regulations, cultural nuances, and market dynamics when implementing AI solutions. For instance, in a Cayman office, we often need to 'Caymanize' group-level initiatives to meet specific regulatory requirements. This balance between global standardisation and local adaptation is crucial for ensuring our AI solutions remain both relevant and effective across all markets."
Financial services faces heightened scrutiny around data security. Jessica notes: "In our sector, particularly within corporate services in the Cayman Islands, I've identified several areas where AI can create value. One key opportunity lies in automating registered office documentation processes. Currently, handling requests for certificates of incumbency and good standing involves considerable manual work despite being high-volume, routine tasks."
Finance and Accounting: Shifting from processing to advisory
Khanh Tran from Vistra illustrates sector transformation: "Our approach begins with understanding genuine client needs. We identified that clients were particularly struggling with accounts payable processes and wanted to move beyond human resource dependency, which led us to implement RPA solutions for invoice processing."
He describes evolution toward advisory: "Looking ahead, with AI, I envision systems automatically generating reports from raw data, saving time while enhancing insight quality and depth. Our service portfolio will likely shift from processing services to analytical and advisory capabilities, as AI handles routine tasks while team members focus on higher-value activities requiring human judgment."
Professional services: Redefining expertise
Jon McClay from Baker McKenzie describes adaptation: "For professional services firms, AI has potential to level the playing field. An experiment by Boston Consulting Group demonstrated that while high-performing consultants remained good with or without AI tools, average performers improved with AI access. I believe this same dynamic will play out at the macro level - top firms will remain top, but mid-tier firms will expand their reach and compete more effectively."
He emphasises strategic implementation: "The first critical step is moving to the cloud. I cannot imagine incorporating generative AI effectively if your data remains fragmented across silos. Getting information into the cloud is absolutely essential."
Client expectation shifts are pronounced. Jon notes: "Clients expect us to be using AI. Only a few express concerns about its presence in our workflow, primarily around information accuracy - something that's rapidly improving with retrieval augmented generation technology."
Cross-industry lessons
Despite industry-specific challenges, common themes emerge:
Regulatory readiness. Regulated industries must balance innovation with compliance. Success requires early regulator engagement and careful documentation of AI decision-making.
Domain expertise remains critical. Technical AI capabilities must combine with deep industry knowledge. Most dangerous implementations prioritise technical sophistication over domain expertise.
Cultural sensitivity. Industries have varying risk tolerance. Transformation strategies must be tailored to industry culture and client expectations.
Measurement complexity. Traditional metrics may not capture value in knowledge-intensive industries. New frameworks must balance quantitative measures with qualitative outcomes.
Talent transformation. Each industry requires different workforce development approaches. Legal needs lawyers understanding AI, while financial services needs compliance experts governing AI implementations.
Cross-industry lessons
Despite industry-specific challenges, common themes emerge:
Regulatory readiness. Regulated industries must balance innovation with compliance. Success requires early regulator engagement and careful documentation of AI decision-making.
Domain expertise remains critical. Technical AI capabilities must combine with deep industry knowledge. Most dangerous implementations prioritise technical sophistication over domain expertise.
Cultural sensitivity. Industries have varying risk tolerance. Transformation strategies must be tailored to industry culture and client expectations.
Measurement complexity. Traditional metrics may not capture value in knowledge-intensive industries. New frameworks must balance quantitative measures with qualitative outcomes.
Talent transformation. Each industry requires different workforce development approaches. Legal needs lawyers understanding AI, while financial services needs compliance experts governing AI implementations.
The message: while AI transformation principles are universal, successful implementation must be tailored to industry realities. Providers understanding these nuances and developing targeted approaches will better serve clients while navigating their own transformation journey.
With industry challenges understood, we turn to quantitative insights from our research.
About Enate
Enate is the leading SaaS solution for business services. Enate orchestrates work from start to finish, giving clients the visibility and control needed to deliver better services. From email management and data analysis to intelligent document processing, Enate also offers a host of touch-button AI features designed to slash the time spent on manual work. Trusted by global service teams, Enate ensures smooth, consistent operations that help clients perform at their best.